Cases 101 - 110 of 597
Rogers v. Brewer et al
as 4:2017cv03683
Plaintiff:
Ralph W Rogers, Sr.
Defendant:
Brewer, LaCox, Preswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clemmons v. Feltz
as 17-3408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Leon Clemmons, Job ID#115661
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew Hodes, Assistant Director of Labor Relations/ M.N.R., David Plumb, Superintendent of Operations/ OPSV Car Clng, Gerald Lorraine, Executive Vice President Transport Workers Union of America and others
Defendant:
John R. Feltz, President Metro North Railroad, Frederick N. Chidester and Nancy F. Eischen, Chair Person, Metro North
Bradshaw v. The City of New York
as 17-2851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, Joseph R. Lindor, Tax ID 881103 and Sergeant Brett Weingarten, Tax ID # 880446
Buchanan v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
as 6:2017cv00505
Petitioner:
Hughey Buchanan
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
as 6:2017cv00504
Petitioner:
Michael Lane
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sullivan v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
as 6:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wayne Sullivan
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sams v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
as 2:2017cv00607
Petitioner:
John A. Sams
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aracely Hernandez v. Washington County Jail, et al
as 17-35672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARACELY HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, PAT GARRETT, Senior Chief Sheriff Deputy, S. SIEMILLER, Lieutenant staff ID 40993 and others
Brandon Michael Pickens v. Frank L. Perry
as 17-6993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK L. PERRY, ROBESON COUNTY, BRAD PERRITT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
