Cases 101 - 110 of 12,505
Raymond David v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1773
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAVID
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 24-1387
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, WELLPATH LLC, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner, Department of Correction and others
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Edgardo Rivera v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1750
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO SOBRADO RIVERA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Pelaez v. Lowerre
as 2:2024cv03216
Petitioner:
Julio Pelaez
Respondent:
Superintendent E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfredo Martinez-Perez v. Gina Clark, et al
as 24-1672
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MARTINEZ-PEREZ
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, Superintendent - SCI Chester, M QUINN, Grievance Coordinator - SCI Chester and DR. PAUL G. LITTLE, Doctor - SCI Chester
Plaza v. Wendland
as 1:2024cv03175
Petitioner:
Ronald Plaza
Respondent:
Superintendent Rosemarie Wendland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald v. Bennett et al
as 7:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Clairmont Donald
Defendant:
Superintendent Stacie Bennett, P. Paige-Connier, Dr. Mikhail Gusman, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAMRO v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Petitioner:
JOSH SHAMRO and JOHN SHAMRO
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI MERCER and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
