Cases 141 - 150 of 7,933
Jon Bryant, Sr. v. Sioux Falls Police Dept., et al
as 23-3061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jon Henri Bryant, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Sioux Falls Police Department, Tom Ward, John Carda and others
Wilkes v. Watson
as 5:2023cv01773
Petitioner:
Joseph Wilkes
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roy Smith v. Liberty County Sheriff, et al
as 23-13040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY COUNTY SHERIFF, TOM DURDEN, Liberty County District Attorney and CHARLES PAUL ROSE, JR., Liberty County Judge
Matthews v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv10210
Plaintiff:
Nathan Matthews
Defendant:
John Doe and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. State of Louisiana
as 23-30624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertus Conner, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, Attorney General, 1st District Court and others
Freeman v. Carter, et al.
as 1:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Adam Russell Freeman
Defendant:
Tom Carter, Twin Falls County Sheriff and Twin Falls County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Hackenberg et al
as 3:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Tom Blake
Defendant:
W. Hackenberg and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Yoksoulian et al
as 1:2023cv08824
Plaintiff:
Thadieus D. Goods
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Yoksoulian, Sgt. Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snodey et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv10094
Plaintiff:
William Gene Snodey
Defendant:
R Valadez, Tom Dart, CCDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. West et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wyatt
Defendant:
C.O. West, Sgt. Hemperly, Deputy Superintendent Banta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
