Cases 151 - 160 of 1,186,082
Ashwood #862639 v. Maloney et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ashwood #862639
Defendant:
Genevieve Maloney, Elizabeth Marsh, Kristen Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Shannon Rochelle Hinton
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Majarro v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Noe Carrillo Majarro
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. Lauderdale County
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Dekoyius L. Reed, Sr
Defendant:
Lauderdale County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamonte v. Waltzer
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Salvadore Lamonte
Defendant:
Nurse Nancey Waltzer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buth v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Van Buth
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Barber
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Cary Jeffcoat
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
