Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 193
Harris v. Boyd et al
as 2:2009cv00271
Petitioner: Carl Harris
Respondent: Louis Boyd and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alverson v. Cummins et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00081
Plaintiff: Rodney Alverson
Defendant: John Cummins, Louis Boyd, Bob Riley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Michael Boyd We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-6022
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL LOUIS BOYD
Poole v. Boyd et al
as 1:2008cv00563
Petitioner: Lashawn Poole
Respondent: Louis Boyd and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCants v. Boyd et al (INMATE2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00783
Plaintiff: Dale Jerome McCants
Defendant: Louis Boyd and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowman v. Boyd et al (INMATE3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00765
Plaintiff: Robie Alan Bowman
Defendant: Louis Boyd and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Porter v. Boyd et al
as 2:2008cv01681
Petitioner: Ontourus Frondesse Porter
Defendant: Louis Boyd and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodson v. Boyd et al (INMATE3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00729
Plaintiff: Sylvester Goodson
Defendant: Louis Boyd and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Poole v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00677
Plaintiff: LaShawn Murrell Poole
Defendant: Louis Boyd and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Poole v. Boyd
as 1:2008cv00034
Petitioner: Lashawn Poole
Respondent: Louis Boyd
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?