Cases 161 - 170 of 7,936
Aldridge v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv05840
Plaintiff:
Devin Aldridge
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Sgt. Reed and C/O Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Galan et al
as 1:2023cv05826
Plaintiff:
Dahveed Morris
Defendant:
Lt. Galan, Cook County Department of Corrections and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barcus v. Keeble et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Trevon S Barcus
Defendant:
Dr Keeble, Melissa Federici and Tom Spangler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Czajkowski (PS) v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv02049
Plaintiff:
Conrad J Czajkowski
Defendant:
Sallie I. Clark, Welling Clark, Stacie Kwitek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Rashane L. Jones
Defendant:
James Brown, R. Osteen, R. Hynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. C.C.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2023cv05444
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lindsey
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C., Tom Dart, Cermak H.C.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Connor v. Dart
as 1:2023cv05131
Petitioner:
Michael W. O'Connor
Respondent:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolton v. Idaho Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Tom Bolton
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv05069
Plaintiff:
Donnelle Thurman
Defendant:
Tom Dart, L. Fenderson and Sorota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
