Cases 11 - 20 of 333
Ronald Martinez v. D. Baughman, et al
as 22-16750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BAUGHMAN, Associate Director CDCR at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento, S. ALFARO, Associate Director CDCR (A) at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento, G. JAIME, Associate Director CDCR (A) at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento and others
USA v. Julian Baughman
as 22-35862
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIAN TYLER BAUGHMAN
(PC) Wheaton v. McComber et al
as 2:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
Gene Paul Wheaton
Defendant:
J. McComber, D. Baughman, V. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY - EL v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN PERRY - EL
Defendant:
BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CAMERAN WITT, KIMBERLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baughman v. USA
as 1:2022cv00023
Petitioner:
Julian Tyler Baughman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Grizzle v. Mcintire et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Bryson Mcintire, Madison Hendricks, Lindsay Hummel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Jones v. Baughman
as 2:2021cv02241
Petitioner:
Danny Jones
Respondent:
David Baughman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henard v. Shradder
as 1:2021cv03123
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Henard
Respondent:
Jeff Shradder
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Services, Monica L. Alberts, Jamie Xiong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baughman v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03016
Petitioner:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alex R. Valdez v. David Baughman
as 2:2021cv05700
Petitioner:
Alex R. Valdez
Respondent:
David Baughman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
