Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Antonio Vera v. Sandra Eastwood, et al
as 16-40982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO FLORES VERA
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDRA EASTWOOD, JUAN GONZALES and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE BRIAN L. OWSLEY
FLORES-DELGADO v. USA
as 1:2016cv01516
Petitioner:
ANTONIO FLORES-DELGADO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Antonio Vera v. Nannett Hassitt, et al
as 16-40443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO FLORES VERA
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE NANNETT HASSETT, 28th District Court, MELLISA K. MADRIGAL, Attorney at Law and UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BRIAN L. OWSLEY
Antonio Vera v. Carlos Valdez, et al
as 16-40441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO FLORES VERA
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLOS VALDEZ, District Attorney, MIKE LOWRENZE, State Investigator and BRIAN L. OWSLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
Antonio Vera v. Sandra Eastwood, et al
as 16-40440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO FLORES VERA
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDRA EASTWOOD, JUAN GONZALES, Lawyer and BRIAN L. OWSLEY, United States District Court Magistrate
Vera v. Eastwood et al
as 2:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flores Vera
Defendant:
Sandra Eastwood, Juan Gonzales and Brian L Owsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vera v. Hassitt et al
as 2:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flores Vera
Defendant:
Nanett Hassitt, Mellisa K. Madrigal and Brian L Owsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores Vera v. Flores Vera et al
as 2:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flores Vera
Defendant:
Carlos Valdez, Mike Lowrenze and Brian L Owsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgardo Flores v. David Long
as 13-56868
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDGARDO ANTONIO FLORES
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. LONG
Flores-Martinez v. FCI, et al
as 13-1409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO FLORES-MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FLORENCE, et al, T.K. COZZA-RHODES, Warden, PRICE, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
