Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 995
Rafael Bean v. Nathan Hoffman
as 24-1220
Petitioner: RAFAEL VERNIER BEAN
Respondent: NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Warden
George v. Allen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv01422
Petitioner: Keenan George
Respondent: Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Deputy Divison Director et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Plaintiff: Juan Vasquez Brown
Defendant: Deputy Division Director, Grievance Officer, Property Room Staff Sergent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris
as 5:2024cv01293
Plaintiff: Marvin Harris
Defendant: John Doe, Acting Warden Bryan D. Phillips, Hollandberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Martin, II v. Clark Scott
as 24-3173
Petitioner: WILLIAM E. MARTIN, II
Respondent: DAVID W. GRAY, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution and CLARK SCOTT, Acting Warden, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff: BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant: STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Derrick Brown, Jr. v. Misty Mackey
as 24-3157
Petitioner: DERRICK L. BROWN, JR.
Respondent: MISTY MACKEY, Acting Warden
McLean v. Greenfield
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner: Lenroy McLean
Respondent: Acting Warden Greenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff: AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant: TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
Cisneros v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00822
Plaintiff: Miguel A. Cisneros
Defendant: Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?