Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Chunn v. Amtrak
as 17-3617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Chunn
Defendant - Appellee:
Amtrak, P.O. Coleman and P.O. Looney
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Agency, Colon, Supervising John Doe, Agent and others
Pruitt v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2017cv01267
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Amtrak and Union Station Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Mehta et al
as 3:2016cv08260
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore
Defendant:
Ruzbelt Mehta, Amtrak and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLMAN v. CLIFTON et al
as 2:2016cv04707
Plaintiff:
JERJUAN DAYMAR TILLMAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM CLIFTON, JOESPH MURPHY and AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 3:2016cv00019
Defendant:
Amtrak Railroad and Union Pacific Railroad
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Chavis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 15-3804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Murphy v. Kansas City Southern Railroad et al
as 3:2015cv00743
Defendant:
Amtrak Railroad, Camtrak Cheical Emergency, Kansas City Southern Railroad and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Kansas City Southern Railroad et al
as 3:2015cv00715
Defendant:
Amtrak Railroad, Camtrak Chemical Emergency, Kansas City Southern Railroad and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chunn v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2014cv06140
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chunn
Defendant:
Amtrak, D.E.A., Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chunn v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2014cv06264
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chunn
Defendant:
Amtrak, D.E.A., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
