Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Bellon v. Williams et al
as 3:2019cv00118
Petitioner:
Robert Linzy Bellon
Respondent:
Warden Brian Williams and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bellon v. Deal et al
as 3:2018cv00294
Defendant:
Krista D Barrie, Dwayne Deal, Marc Digiacomo and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Linzy Bellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bellon v. Baker et al
as 3:2018cv00081
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Robert Linzy Bellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Bellon v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 17-17005
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LINZY BELLON
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
BELLON v. FERGUSON
as 3:2015cv00131
Petitioner:
CHARLES BELLON
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cruz v. Bellon et al
as 3:2014cv01408
Plaintiff:
Janaro Velez Cruz
Defendant:
Bellon, Macdonald, Timothy Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bellon v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 14-16787
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LINZY BELLON
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
O'Keefe v. Gillespie et al
as 3:2014cv00385
Defendant:
Bellon and Maningo, Clark County District Attorney's Office, Doug Gillespie and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Bellon v. James Purkett
as 14-1227
Petitioner - Appellant:
Brian C. Bellon
Respondent - Appellee:
James Purkett
Hamilton v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2013cv03785
Plaintiff:
Terrance Hamilton, Charlie Lee Million and Devon Davis
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., George Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
