Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Carl Whitehead v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 13-4682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI
WHITEHEAD v. MCDANIEL et al
as 2:2013cv00929
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
DONNA JO MCDANIEL, HELEN LYNCH and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, ROGER SMITH, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITEHEAD v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, GEORGE GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Whitehead v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 08-4423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM and ATTY GEN PA
WHITEHEAD v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2008cv00259
Petitioner:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheeler, et al v. Shellenberger, et al
as 05-2969
Plaintiff:
AARON CHRISTOPHER WHEELER, THEODORE SAVAGE and JAMES STEPHEN PAVLICHKO, SR.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I
Defendant:
JOHN O.J. SHELLENBERGER, III, EVERING, SAM ASH MUSIC SUPPLY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GRATERFORD SCI, GRATERFORD SCI MEDICAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Wheeler, et al v. Shellenberger, et al
as 04-4696
Plaintiff:
AARON CHRISTOPHER WHEELER, THEODORE SAVAGE, JAMES STEPHEN PAVLICHKO, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN O.J. SHELLENBERGER, III, EVERING, SAM ASH MUSIC SUPPLY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GRATERFORD SCI, GRATERFORD SCI MEDICAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Appellant:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
