Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Constant v. Marion County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
Brian Charles Pierre Constant, III
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Ron Burnett, S. Denardis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONSTANT v. CLEMMONS et al
as 3:2020cv05617
Defendant:
CALVIN LEAVEN CRUM, MASTERS, CHOPP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES PIERRE CONSTANT, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONSTANT v. CLEMMONS et al
as 3:2020cv05389
Defendant:
BURACH, MASTERS, BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES PIERRE CONSTANT, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONSTANT v. BROWN et al
as 5:2020cv00085
Defendant:
J LAND, FOSKEY, PEARSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES PIERRE CONSTANT, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constant v. Beasley et al
as 5:2020cv00085
Defendant:
A. Torres, FNU Brown, T Counts and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Charles Pierre Constant, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mendoza v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2019cv01713
Defendant:
Stu Sherman, A. Shaw, David Constante and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2019cv03927
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, STROMS, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWANE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constant v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv23291
Plaintiff:
Jackenson Constant
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Constant et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv01044
Petitioner:
Gary Freemont, Thomas Marvens, Pierre Rameck and others
Respondent:
Honorable Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, United States Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey J. Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kretzer v. Burns et al
as 2:2018cv01682
Defendant:
Officer Burns, City of Kent, WA, Officer Cortinas and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morris Kretzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
