Cases 11 - 20 of 1,852
Shawn Goff v. Anthony Coleman, et al
as 22-16176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN CHARLES GOFF
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY COLEMAN, Deputy Warden, THOMPSON, Unknown: replaced with Gerald Thompson as listed in the first amended complaint (doc. 11), KIMBLE, Unknown : current Warden and others
Richardson v. Ryan
as 2:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Gerald Richardson
Defendant:
Charles Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lerma #80531 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Lerma
Defendant:
David Shinn, Charles Ryan, Unknown Shivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tripati v. Carter et al
as 2:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Paul Edward Carter, Unknown Carter, Michael Evan Gottfried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chapman v. Ryan
as 2:2021cv01512
Plaintiff:
Kevin Chapman
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, David Shinn, Centurion of Arizona LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01434
Plaintiff:
Eva Mayfield
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Charles Ryan, Roxanne Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01381
Plaintiff:
Charlene Williams
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Charles Ryan, Wesley McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01158
Plaintiff:
Paul Adams
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated, Centurion of Arizona LLC and Charles Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Ryan
as 2:2021cv00676
Plaintiff:
Daniel Glover
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Jessica Todd, Deborah Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #151089 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00559
Defendant:
Levi Brass, Hope Ping, Shannon Thielman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
