Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Eastridge v. Illinois et al
as 3:2019cv01364
Plaintiff:
James Darren Eastridge
Defendant:
Circuit Court Fifth Judicial Circuit of Illinois, City of Danville, Illinois, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Danville Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2019cv00848
Plaintiff:
Mins Shaqueile Wilkerson
Defendant:
City of Danville and Danville Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Commonwealth of Virginia City of Danville
as 7:2019cv00746
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia City of Danville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Commonwealth City of Danville, VA
as 7:2019cv00719
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Commonwealth City of Danville, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Commonwealth City of Danville, VA
as 3:2019cv00787
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Commonwealth City of Danville, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Commonwealth of Virginia City of Danville
as 3:2019cv00788
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia City of Danville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv02143
Defendant:
Shayne Cassidy, Dennis Gardner, Michael Maria and others
Plaintiff:
William Morgan and Paul Farrow, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNOW v. CITY OF DANVILLE INDIANA et al
as 1:2018cv03723
Plaintiff:
ERNEST R. SNOW, JR.
Defendant:
BRAD CASSELMAN, LOREN DELP, DANIEL F. ZIELINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Strickland v. Mike Mondule
as 14-7465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD E. STRICKLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL S. MONDULE, Sheriff, SERGEANT BREA, SERGEANT MILAM and others
Defendant:
CITY OF DANVILLE
Hill v. Danville Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv02079
Plaintiff:
Theodore Hill
Defendant:
Danville Police Department, Scott Crawley and City of Danville Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
