Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,851
RUPERT v. PROGAR et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Petitioner: JODI LYNN RUPERT
Respondent: DAVE PROGAR, TIM RUPERT, DISGUISED PAROLE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Tims v. Dave Fields, et al
as 24-1475
Plaintiff: DENNIS J. TIMS
Defendant: DAVE FIELDS, TODD TESSEMAN and LINDA KLOVAS
Dennis Tims v. Dave Fields, et al
as 24-1476
Plaintiff: DENNIS J. TIMS
Defendant: DAVE FIELDS, TODD TESSEMAN and LINDA KLOVAS
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff: William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant: United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Huss v. Woelfel et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Huss
Defendant: Deputy Woelfel, Investigator Glasel, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Jones v. Dave Yost
as 24-3184
Petitioner: MATTHEW JONES
Respondent: DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General
Landis v. Krabbenhoft
as 1:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Douglas E. Landis
Respondent: Dave Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAPHOOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: DAVE GAPHOOR
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Jacobs v. Marion Correctional Institution, et al
as 24-3092
Plaintiff: PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Defendant: MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY and others
Williams v. Shroader et al
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff: Terrence Williams
Defendant: Nlcholas Shroader, Matthew Gallacier, Adam Linder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?