Cases 11 - 20 of 292
Johnson v. Spurgeon et al
as 4:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
D. Spurgeon, N. Avila, A. Pachynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv09053
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ronald Broomfield and L. Tobin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv07858
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sanchez, Lieutenant Boise and R. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dart
as 1:2022cv06263
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Wiggins v. Richardson et al
as 5:2022cv02381
Plaintiff:
Derell D. Wiggins
Defendant:
Neville Richardson, David Johnson, Jacquetta Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Rosalez et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
R. Rosalez, Sergeant A. Cuevas, S. Stribling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. OBERLANDER et al
as 5:2022cv02171
Petitioner:
SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON
Respondent:
DERICK F. OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Johnson v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
