Cases 11 - 20 of 1,025
Ferreira v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00402
Petitioner:
Edmond Ferreira
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edmond, Lucson v. Pena
as 1:2024cv20769
Plaintiff:
Lucson Edmond
Defendant:
Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynette Wright
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Stanley C. Dickerson, Talea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson, Jr. v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Edmond Allen Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, LLC, Corizon of Florida, LLC, Dr. Erron Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Edmonds et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney Edmonds, U.S. Attorney Williams, Det. Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fredrick Edmond v. Dennis Reagle
as 23-3359
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDRICK L. EDMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
DENNIS REAGLE, Warden
Pedigo v. Leman et al
as 4:2023cv04115
Plaintiff:
David Edmond Pedigo
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Leman, Correctional Officer Shine, Correctional Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sarnowski v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01811
Petitioner:
Bryan Edmond Sarnowski
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
De'Vontay Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Vencini Smith, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
