Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Mahoney v. USA
as 1:2021fp00364
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Martin
as 1:2020cv00349
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Martin
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Rupska et al
as 5:2019hc02163
Respondent:
William Barr, Associate Warden Rupska and Assistant Warden Irwin
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Holland et al
as 5:2018ct03328
Defendant:
Counselor Wiggins, Captain Rule, J.C. Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahoney v. Grondolsky
as 1:2017cv11142
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. FMC Devens, Warden et al
as 1:2015fp00213
Respondent:
FMC Devens, Warden and US Attorney General
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mahoney v. State of New Hampshire, et al
as 1:2014fp00431
Defendant:
Carol Ann Conboy, Linda Stewart Dalianis, James E. Duggan and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoney v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2014cv13821
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Defendant:
Jeff Grondolsky, S. Brown, K. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahoney v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2013cv12291
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2013cv11564
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
