Cases 11 - 20 of 279
Muthana et al v. DeAngelo et al
as 2:2023cv12255
Plaintiff:
Ali Musaid Muthana, Mikel Smith, Joshua Paradien and others
Defendant:
Jodi L DeAngelo, Zarie Phillips, J. Gonzalez and others
Brown v. LA Dept of Safety & Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Dale Brown
Defendant:
Louisiana Dept of Safety & Corrections, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Marcus Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. DYKES et al
as 3:2023cv10561
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAIVER MATHEWS
Defendant:
DYKES, W WALTERS, GUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. WALTERS et al
as 3:2023cv10264
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
W WALTERS, C LESSER, T BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunn v. Emmerich
as 3:2023cv00627
Petitioner:
Timothy Jermaine Gunn
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kimbrough v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Quintan J. Kimbrough
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections, Malik Miller, Branden C. Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornel Jackson v. County of Madera, et al
as 22-16920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MADERA, a Municipality of the State of California, BRETT FRAZIER, DAVID ROGERS and others
MATHEWS v. WALTERS
as 3:2022cv24816
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAIVER MATHEWS
Defendant:
W WALTERS and GUNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azhar Lal v. USA, et al
as 22-16907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AZHAR LAL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HENRY CATTO, JAMES BAKER and others
Gunn v. United States Of America
as 1:2022cv00151
Petitioner:
Amanda Gunn
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
