Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,364
Michael Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11482
Petitioner: MICHAEL HENDERSON
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
General Inmate Population of Chippewa Cree Tribal Adult Detention Center et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: General Inmate Population of Chippewa Cree Tribal Adult Detention Center, Tyrell Henderson, Tyson Eagleman and others
Defendant: Annaleese Johnson, Dalelynn Henderson and Steve Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Henderson
as 4:2024cv00795
Plaintiff: DeAmontae Manning
Defendant: Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Meyers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00156
Petitioner: Javaris R. Henderson
Respondent: Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Titus Henderson v. Jodie Perttu, et al
as 24-1760
Plaintiff: TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant: JODIE PERTTU, ANGELO PANOS, MAKDA FESSAHAYE and others
Titus Henderson v. Rachel Matushak, et al
as 24-1761
Plaintiff: TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant: RACHEL MATUSHAK, CASSANDRA BAIR, TONIA ROZMARYNOSKI and others
Titus Henderson v. Matthew Frank, et al
as 24-1756
Plaintiff: TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant: MATTHEW FRANK, JONNI SHANNON-SHARPE, SARA MASON and others
Titus Henderson v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 24-1757
Plaintiff: TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant: GARY HAMBLIN, TIM HAINES, Superintendent, RICHARD S. SCHNEITER and others
Titus Henderson v. Edward Wall, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff: TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant: EDWARD WALL, GARY BOUGHTON, SARA MASON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?