Cases 11 - 20 of 29
HAUN v. JONES
as 5:2021cv00220
Petitioner:
STEVEN WAYNE HAUN
Respondent:
EDDIE JONES and WARDEN OF FCI TALLAHASSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moses v. Mahmoud et al
as 2:2020cv02361
Plaintiff:
Daytrend Denone Moses
Defendant:
Darryl Richardson, Mohamed Mahmoud, Elizabeth Raiford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahms v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
David Dahms
Defendant:
Mike Haun, Correct Care Solutions, Inc., James Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Haun et al
as 3:2016cv00815
Plaintiff:
Avren Lamont Scott
Defendant:
Mike Haun and Fredrick Kemen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Hedin v. Haun Castillo, et al
as 16-36056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY PAUL HEDIN
Defendant - Appellee:
HAUN D. CASTILLO, Regional Director, Western Region, in their individual capacities, MARION FEATHER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, in their individual capacities, RICHARD KOWALCZCK, Head Chaplian, Federal Correctional Institution, in their individual capacities and others
Haun v. Erwin et al
as 4:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Leslie Haun
Defendant:
James Erwin, David Higgs, Micheal Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthen v. Blanchard et al
as 2:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Scott G. Worthen
Defendant:
Donald Blanchard, Curtis Gamer, Cheryl Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haun v. Thompson et al
as 3:2015cv00069
Petitioner:
Leslie Haun
Respondent:
LaDonna H. Thompson , Ronald Carey , Alan D. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Holder et al
as 5:2015cv01446
Plaintiff:
Gale Joseph Young
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Malinda Haggen, Kathryn Haun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedin v. Castillo et al
as 3:2014cv01504
Defendant:
Haun D. Castillo, Marion Feather, Richard Kowalczck and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Paul Hedin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
