Cases 11 - 20 of 288
Mayo v. Mayo et al
as 1:2023cv03370
Petitioner:
Maurice Mayo, Jr.
Respondent:
Latasha P. Mayo, Janele Hyer-Spencer and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robin Row v. Janell Clement, et al
as 23-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBIN LEE ROW
Respondent / Appellee:
JANELL CLEMENT, THOMAS J. BEAUCLAIR and BRIAN UNDERWOOD
Rhodes v. Shannon, et al
as 23-8026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTY W. RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SHANNON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, EDDIE WILSON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Prison Administrator, SETH NORRIS, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ture v. Freeman et al
as 0:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donald Ture, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Freeman, Kathleen Heaney, Peter Orput and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vreeland v. Voightsberger, et al
as 23-8020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL VOIGHTSBERGER, MICHAEL PACHECO, ANDREW BURKHALTER and others
Hampton v. Allstate Insurance
as 4:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Janell Elizabeth Hampton
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valencia v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Janel Jiovanni Valencia
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Barker v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Christeena Janell Barker
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
