Cases 11 - 20 of 2,184
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Defendant:
B. SAWICKI, JOHN DOE 1, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
NOAH SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLLETTE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN FOLLETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TECKENBROCK v. HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Defendant:
UNDERWOOD, JOHN REYNOLDS and HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
BRIAN W. TECKENBROCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Doctors et al
as 3:2024cv00704
Defendant:
John Doe, Officers and Doctors
Plaintiff:
Sean D Gates and Sean Gates
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Follette v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Follette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv01386
Defendant:
PAULA DICKSON, TISHA THOMPSON, J.D. BALLANGER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01357
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC and MARK SEVIER
Plaintiff:
JOHN TYLER LONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
