Cases 11 - 20 of 495
(HC) Ramos v. Lemon
as 1:2023cv01707
Petitioner:
Gavino Cirilo Ramos
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv04301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson, Inmates of Clayton County Jail, Christopher Troy Gather and others
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Jansen v. Lemon
as 2:2023cv02018
Petitioner:
Michael Jansen and Michael Edward Jansen
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murillo v. CDCR et al
as 3:2023cv04450
Plaintiff:
Mona Salcida Murillo
Defendant:
CDCR, M. B. Atchley, Johnthich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Pech v. Lemon
as 1:2023cv01292
Petitioner:
David Khouny Pech
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Pech v. Lemon
as 2:2023cv01853
Petitioner:
David Khouny Pech
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McSean v. Lemons et al
as 4:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Jessica Lemons and Unknown Bainbridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Quintero v. Lemon et al
as 1:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon and Oxborrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Quintero v. Lemon et al
as 2:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon and Oxborrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Breceda v. Tristan Lemon
as 8:2023cv01536
Petitioner:
John Breceda
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
