Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Goolsby v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Thomas Goolsby
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, William Gore, K. Kamoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petillo v. Kearnan et al
as 3:2016cv01950
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Joel Petillo
Defendant:
Scott Kearnan, J. Janda, J. Builteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. King County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
Emanuel D Fair
Defendant:
King County Correctional Center, Claudia Balducci, KCDAJD Policy Committee Member 2012 to Present and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. French et al
as 1:2016cv01053
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
French, Pierce, G Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Punke et al
as 1:2016cv01038
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Jackson
Defendant:
. Punke, . Prentice, N Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2015cv04423
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Butler
Defendant:
Charleston County , Charleston County Sheriff's Office , James Alton Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Crews et al
as 3:2013cv00919
Plaintiff:
Kelvin D. Harris
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, Mr. Chris Landrum, Mr. Mock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
John Michael Kirk
Defendant:
Smith, M.R. Barnes, D. Cohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. SCI FOREST
as 1:2013cv00047
Petitioner:
JORDAN HEATH, M.R.
Respondent:
SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunigan v. United States et al
as 2:2012cv03048
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
United States, People of the State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
