Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Murzike v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
D. Allen, A. Woren, M.G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bowens et al
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Antonio Williams
Defendant:
Warden Mr. Bowens, Mr. Jackson, Captain Mrs. Stentson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. 201 Poplar Ave. / Shelby County Sheriff / CJC et al
as 2:2022cv02850
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
201 Poplar Ave. / Shelby County Sheriff / CJC, Floyd Bonner, Chief Rudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv50403
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Johnson, Bergami, A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boggs v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Boggs
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Godwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Zavala v. Nash et al
as 1:2022cv03082
Plaintiff:
David Zavala
Defendant:
Warden C. Nash, Ms. Whitehead, Captain Brownfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
F. Dreesen, Morin, Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
JAMES v. REDMOND et al
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL JOHN JAMES
Defendant:
REDMOND, JAMES, K METZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
