Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Fatir et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir, Malachai DeBruce, Antonio R. Bailey and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Dana Metzger, Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Parrish et al
as 2:2017cv14289
Plaintiff:
Keiontae R. Bailey
Defendant:
Parrish, Parker, Rupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
Jackson v. Stolworthy et al
as 3:2017cv00420
Plaintiff:
Stevie Jackson
Defendant:
Donald Stolworthy, Mueller, Donald Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Nunnally v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 16-1483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. NUNNALLY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, DUNCAN MCLARIN, Deputy Warden, LORI DAVIS, Registered Nurse and others
Bailey v. Palm Beach Sheriff et al
as 9:2015cv81205
Plaintiff:
Keiontae R. Bailey
Defendant:
Palm Beach Sheriff, Trinity Services Group Inc. and Swanson Companies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2015cv80825
Plaintiff:
Keiontae R. Bailey
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw and Tutko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Nunnally #181375 v. Woods et al
as 2:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Nunnally #181375
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Duncan McLarin, Lori Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Columbia SC, The City of et al
as 4:2012cv02147
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reginald Brooks
Defendant:
Columbia SC, The City of, Richland SC, County of, Pop's New York Pizza Wings & Hoagies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
