Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Waits v. Woodall et al
as 2:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Sam Floyd Waits
Defendant:
R. Woodall and Wexford Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waites v. Woodall et al
as 1:2013cv00558
Plaintiff:
Sam Floyd Waites
Defendant:
R. Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
Darryl Mann
Defendant:
Ronald King , R. Woodall and Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. King et al
as 2:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Darryl Mann
Defendant:
Ronald King, R. Woodall and Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ducksworth v. Woodall et al
as 1:2013cv00486
Plaintiff:
Tony Edward Ducksworth
Defendant:
R. Woodall , Maggie McClellan and Ron King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ducksworth v. Woodall et al
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tony Edward Ducksworth
Defendant:
R. Woodall, Jane Doe and Ron King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. SMCI(Med)
as 2:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Ray
Defendant:
SMCI (Med) and R. Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Woodall et al
as 2:2010cv00256
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Kelly
Defendant:
R. Woodall, Mark Davis and Mark Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennie Mack, Jr. v. James Woodall, Jr.
as 10-6779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE A. MACK, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES R. WOODALL, JR., In his individual capacity and in his official capacity as District Attorney for the 15 B Prosecutorial District of North Carolina, ANAND P. RAMASWAMY, In his individual capacity and in his former official capacity as Assistant District Attorney for the 15B Prosecutorial District of North Carolina, ROY COOPER, In his individual capacity and in his official capacity as North Carolina Attorney General and others
Defendant:
BRENDA HOWARD, In her individual capacity and JAMES NEWKIRK
MACK v. WOODALL
as 1:2008cv00753
Plaintiff:
BENNIE AUSTIN MACK, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES R. WOODALL, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
