Cases 11 - 20 of 50
ALEXANDER v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, "EECF" et al
as 2:2021cv04580
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF ESSEX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Coleman
as 1:2020cv03352
Respondent:
Jeff Coleman
Petitioner:
Robert Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Palmer v. Flood et al
as 2:2020cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Palmer
Defendant:
Nassau County Sheriff's Department, D. Henig and Vera Flood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. DOE et al
as 4:2019cv00553
Defendant:
JANE DOE, BRADFORD RIGBY, ANN HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Alexander et al
as 6:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Marshall Todd Ward
Defendant:
Shannon Medical Center and Robert Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANNER v. WHITE et al
as 5:2018cv00420
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER RUFUS LOGAN, WARDEN JERMAINE WHITE, COUNSELOR WANDA ATKINS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE BRANNER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANNER v. White et al
as 3:2018cv00080
Defendant:
Jermaine White, Wanda Atkins, Robert Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE BRANNER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2017cv00545
Petitioner:
Robert Alexander
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and B. True
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joe Valdez, Sr. v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 16-10754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE CARL VALDEZ, SR., also known as Robert Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, NORVEL ARNOLD, Warden, WARNER B. MASSEY, Doctor and others
Robert Koester v. E. Pfeifer, et al
as 16-3294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALEXANDER KOESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
E. MICHAEL PFEIFER, Prosecutor and KATHLEEN A. AUBRY, Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
