Cases 11 - 19 of 19
JOHNSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv07026
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., JIM HOOD, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Zachary Johnson and Russell Keith Hill
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General State of Mississippi, Michael T. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jonnson et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv06234
Defendant:
James L. Dennis, Patrick E, Higginbotham, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Keith Hill and Zachary Jonnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2012cv01282
Plaintiff:
Zachary Johnson and Russell Keith Hill
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, Jim Hood, Michael T Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell Hill v. City of Purvis, Mississippi, et al
as 09-60143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PURVIS, MISSISSIPPI, JIMMY BOONE, THOMAS SCHWARTZ and others
Russell Hill v. Marvin Breazeale, et al
as 09-60122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARVIN E BREAZEALE, CATHY TATUM and LAMAR COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
Russell Hill v. Robert Mingo, et al
as 09-60136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MINGO, Warden at Marion/Walthall Correctional Facility and MARVIN E BREAZEALE, Sheriff, Lamar County
Hill v. Sephton
as 08-60954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTY W SEPHTON, of Mississippi Supreme Court, individual and official capacity
Hill v. Banks
as 2:2007cv00139
Plaintiff:
Russell Keith Hill
Defendant:
Jackelyn Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
