Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Ortiz-Lopez et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00931
Plaintiff:
Jhair Generoso Paternina-Christopher, Hernando Antionio Jimenez-Ortiz, Jose Maria Barrios-Ipuana and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jefferson B Sessions, III and Loretta E Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
ELDER NEHEMIAS LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JHAIR GENEROSO PATERNINA-CHRISTOPHER and others
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Rodriguez v. Kimberly Seibel
as 17-55768
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
USA v. Raul Rodriguez-Argon
as 16-3873
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ-ARGON
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Arriola v. USA
as 3:2016cv00860
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Raul Rodriguez-Arriola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Argon
as 3:2016cv50214
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raul Rodriguez-Argon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raul Rodriguez v. Kimberly A Seibel
as 5:2015cv02554
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez
Respondent:
Kimberly A Seibel
USA v. Raul Rodriguez
as 15-2403
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ, also known as Julian Rodriguez also known as Carlos Heriberto Rios Cabello
Raul Rodriguez v. A.M. Gonzalez
as 5:2014cv02271
Respondent:
A.M. Gonzalez
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
