Cases 11 - 20 of 279
Robert Decker v. Brian Lammer
as 23-2179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
Robert Decker v. Katherine Sireveld, et al
as 23-1725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE SIREVELD, Legal Deprtment of terre Haute & Marion F.C.I.'s, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Robert Davis v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 23-1576
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI
Walker v. Inselmann
as 2:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Robert K Inselmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert Decker v. Dan Sproul
as 23-1585
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLLETTE PETERS, SARA QURESHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JONES, TRUEBLOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Graham v. Chisholm et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Graham
Defendant:
Melinda Chisholm, Ms. Card, Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOOTH, POINTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
