Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph Watterson v. S. Wilkinson
as 10-7004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH A. WATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
S. WILKINSON, Officer, Gaston County Sheriff's Office and NFN GROSCH, Officer, Gaston County Sheriff's Office
Defendant:
MAX DAVIS, Sergeant, Gaston County Sheriff's Office, FNU CLONIGER, Sheriff and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 10-50527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, PRESIDENT OF THE USA and others
Slupkowski v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Washington D.C. et al
as 0:2009cv01936
Petitioner:
Stanley A. Slupkowski
Respondent:
Secretary of Health and Human Services Washington D.C. and Secretary of Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
SLUPKOWSKI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WASHINGTON D.C. et al
as 1:2009cv00938
Petitioner:
STANLEY A. SLUPKOWSKI
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WASHINGTON D.C. and SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SLUPKOWSKI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WASHINGTON D.C. et al
as 1:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
STANLEY A. SLUPKOWSKI
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WASHINGTON D.C. and SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Maas Risenhoover v. Theresa Wilson, et al
as 08-1656
Petitioner - Appellant:
Paul Maas Risenhoover
Respondent - Appellee:
Theresa Wilson, Patricia Kinzer, Jenna Pennfield and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
