Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Clark v. Roberts, et al
as 13-3003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ULYSSES CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Former Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, and Secretary of Kansas Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity, JERRY BOYLE, Chief Executive Officer, Correct Care Solutions, in his individual and official capacity, JON BOSCH, Executive Vice President, Chief of Institutional Care, Correct Care Solutions, in his individual and official capacity and others
Clark v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03218
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Clark
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Jerry Boyle, Jon Bosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ho v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv03189
Petitioner:
Tien Ho
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Tien et al
as 3:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
Darrel L Smith
Defendant:
Tien and William Gore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen v. Grounds et al
as 3:2010cv04124
Petitioner:
Tien Nguyen
Respondent:
Randy Grounds and Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv01665
Petitioner:
Loc Tien Nguyen
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tien v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv02436
Petitioner:
Johnny S. Tien
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HO v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv02828
Petitioner:
CONG TIEN HO
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHEAL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LUONG v. USA
as 3:2007cv00141
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TIEN QUYET LUONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LUONG v. USA
as 3:2007cv00136
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TIEN QUYET LUONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
