Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Prall v. Cococcia
as 13-1280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tormu E. Prall
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan Cococcia, Mary E. Ahern, Judith E. Wildfeuer and others
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Prall v. MA Supreme Judicial Court, et al
as 12-2092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MA SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, OFFICE OF THE BAR COUNSEL, CITY OF BOSTON, Law Department and others
PRALL v. SIMANDLE
as 3:2012cv01886
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE, FREDA L. WOLFSON, CAMDEN DISTRICT COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 12-1760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
PRALL v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
as 3:2012cv00299
Petitioner:
TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prall v. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2012cv10104
Plaintiff:
Tormu E. Prall
Defendant:
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Office of The Bar Counsel, City of Boston Law Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
as 1:2011cv02269
Petitioner:
TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 3:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
