Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Landis v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv00177
Defendant:
Unknown Lott, Unknown Rogers, M. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Correctional Health Services, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jermaine Bowens, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon #332031 v. Kerris et al
as 2:2018cv04211
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Unknown Kirk, Unknown Marty and others
Plaintiff:
Josef Timothy Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boles #156632 v. Rogers et al
as 1:2018cv01297
Defendant:
Charles Bernard, Unknown Rogers, Joan E. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Boles #156632, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anaya v. Munoz et al
as 2:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Unknown Williams, Unknown Perrotta, Unknown Sandavol and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Esteban Anaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv04245
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Unknown Kirk, Unknown Goodard and others
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates #619169 v. Rogers et al
as 2:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers and Lisa Belanger
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Yates #619169
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby #254713 v. Rogers et al
as 2:2018cv00154
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Jamie Corrigan and S. Thompson
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hamby #254713
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00380
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Gloria Gethier, Unknown Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv02073
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Paul Penzone, Unknown Alcula and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jermaine Bowens, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
