Cases 11 - 20 of 298
Reagan v. City of Barberton et al
as 5:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
William G. Reagan
Defendant:
City of Barberton, Barberton Police Department, Edward Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Workman et al
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
James Patterson
Defendant:
William G Workman and David Fitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Skinner v. Prummell et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Petitioner:
Robert Allen Skinner
Defendant:
William G. Prummell, Jr., Lorenzo Mata, Charlotte County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Curtis v. Trate
as 1:2022cv00415
Petitioner:
William G. Curtis
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Creasy v. Fink
as 3:2022cv00033
Petitioner:
William G. Creasy
Respondent:
Martin Fink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Creasy v. Fink
as 3:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
William G. Creasy
Respondent:
Martin Fink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Creasy v. Fink
as 3:2022cv00035
Petitioner:
William G. Creasy
Respondent:
Martin Fink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oatman v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2021cv02178
Plaintiff:
Andre L Oatman
Defendant:
William G Montgomery, Jeremy D Miller, Jerry Bernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
