Cases 241 - 250 of 1,186,082
Moore v. Reyes et al
as 5:2024cv05032
Petitioner:
Nakota Moore
Respondent:
Alex Reyes and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yexley v. Clark County et al
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Yexley
Defendant:
Clark County, Jeff Kollars, Kellie Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00231
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Defendant:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02336
Petitioner:
Stanley D. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02337
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Florez-Ramirez v. Jacques Jones, et al.,
as 2:2024cv02335
Plaintiff:
Florez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Jacques Jones, Tracy Williams, Carlus Cleaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutherland v. USA
as 3:2024cv01219
Petitioner:
Joshua Sutherland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Byrd v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Norman Byrd
Defendant:
NFN Gonzales, NFN Cummings and NFN Suffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olvera-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Olvera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
