Cases 21 - 30 of 28,695
Canty v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv04028
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
OLUWADAMILARE v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06201
Petitioner:
ADELKE B. OLUWADAMILARE
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Deases v. Mr. B. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv01857
Plaintiff:
Estevan Deases
Defendant:
Mr. B. Cain and M.T.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence Jefferson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10829
Petitioner:
TERRENCE B. JEFFERSON
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Tryan (PS) v. Morehead et al
as 1:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Joshua B. Tryan
Defendant:
Morehead and Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott (PS) v. CJC et al
as 1:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
CJC, El Paso County and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hess #353733 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Greg John Hess
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Cochise, County of, Cochise County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarango v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jesus A Tarango
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Buckeye, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Nashville Police Dept. et al
as 2:2024cv02332
Plaintiff:
Timothy Singleton
Defendant:
Nashville Police Dept., City of Nashville, Tennessee State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
