Cases 21 - 30 of 539
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Obaisi et al
as 3:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
James J Chatman
Defendant:
Dr Obaisi, Lars A Gentry, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Washoe County Detention Center
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Marcel Chatman
Defendant:
Washoe County Detention Center, Washoe County, WCDF Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimball v. Minor et al
as 4:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kimball
Defendant:
Justine Minor and Kimberly Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Anthony Chatman v. Neil McDowell et al
as 5:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Raymond Anthony Chatman
Defendant:
Neil McDowell, C. Callahan, Kendell Dawson Wasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcus Chatman v. FCC Coleman - Medium Warden
as 22-11075
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS CHATMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM WARDEN
Raymond Anthony Chatman v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2022cv00559
Petitioner:
Raymond Anthony Chatman
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
Marcus Chatman
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan et al v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall D Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
