Cases 21 - 30 of 248
Tyndale v. Dean et al
as 1:2023cv01594
Petitioner:
Ernest Arnim Tyndale
Respondent:
Robert Deam, Warden, JCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyner v. The State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Tyner
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, Larry Hogan, Wes Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Eplett et al
as 2:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, Toney and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
Shaunric Anthoni Brown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Bowens et al
as 2:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens and Tracy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Ballard
as 2:2022cv02200
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Brown
Defendant:
A. Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Bugge et al
as 2:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Brown
Defendant:
B Bugge, J Rickert, B. Bugge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Anthony Brown v. State of California
as 5:2022cv01260
Petitioner:
Norman Anthony Brown
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Brown v. TN, et al
as 22-5504
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Respondent:
TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLE and HERBERT HARRISON SLATERY, III, Tennessee Attorney General & Reporter
Brown v. Michaelis et al
as 2:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Maurice Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Jaci Michaelis, Patrick Strand and Amber Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
