Cases 21 - 30 of 392
(PC) Kidwell v. Collins, et al
as 2:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Harper, Sequoyah Deserthawk Kidwell and Jason Scott Harper
Defendant:
Jason Collins, Donna Williams, Jose Cisneros Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Armenta v. Gipson et al
as 2:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Johnson, Trenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Sams v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-15643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PLAS SAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, CHELSEA ARMENTA, Office Services Supervisor I, W. HAWKINGS, Correctional Captain and others
Franco v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2022cv08064
Plaintiff:
Rudy Franco and Rudy Armenta Franco
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, David Shinn and GEO Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armenta #191079 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Petitioner:
Cezan C Armenta
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Sierra v. Covello et al
as 2:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, N. Costa, K. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Armenta v. Shah et al
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
Shah, Keith Taylor, Nicholas Theobald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. LANCE, ET AL
as 1:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
RICKY BANKS
Defendant:
DR. EDWARD LANCE and SGT. H. ARMENTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Daniel Frazer v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv02117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frazer
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Jeffrey Macomber, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
