Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Pickens v. Nelson et al
as 2:2008cv00570
Plaintiff:
William Ivy Pickens
Defendant:
Amber Nelson and Bezy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carl McIntosh v. Rick Veach, et al
as 08-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK V. VEACH, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES and others
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUSKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
DAVID RICHARD SPENCER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BEZY, R COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABUHOURAN v. MORRISON et al
as 2:2007cv05513
Plaintiff:
HITHAM ABUHOURAN
Defendant:
R. L. MORRISON, MARK A. BEZY, EDWARD B. MOTLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIRBY v. BLACK et al
as 1:2007cv01521
Plaintiff:
TERRY WAYNE KIRBY
Defendant:
S. BLACK, TROUTMAN and MARK A BEZY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv01804
Petitioner:
Robert William Marshall
Respondent:
Dora Schriro, Bezy and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Bezy et al
as 2:2007cv01363
Petitioner:
Patrice E Brown
Respondent:
Mark A. Bezy and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pupo-Leyvas v. Bezy
as 2:2007cv01032
Plaintiff:
Manuel Pupo-Leyvas
Defendant:
Mark A. Bezy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WALKER et al v. SCHOTT et al
as 2:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD W. SCHOTT, DARYL KOSIAK, MICHAEL K NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
