Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Ronnie Nicholson v. Scott Eckstein, et al
as 16-3308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE F. NICHOLSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT ECKSTEIN and BRIAN MILLER, Captain
Miller v. Breeden et al
as 3:2016cv00627
Defendant:
K Breeden, C/O Reeder and C/O Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Brian Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Boone et al
as 3:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Brian Miller
Defendant:
C/O Boone, Stallings, Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson v. Eckstein et al
as 2:2016cv00310
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Frank Nicholson, Jr
Defendant:
Scott Eckstein and Brian Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUMMINGS v. MILLER
as 2:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
ROY CUMMINGS, JR.
Defendant:
BRIAN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamancusa v. Garman et al
as 4:2015cv02400
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamancusa
Defendant:
Mark Garman and Brian Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Doehling et al
as 2:2015cv01253
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Booth
Defendant:
L Doehling , Sharon Moerchen, C Barter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De'Wayne G. Thomas v. Miller
as 1:2015cv00727
Plaintiff:
De'Wayne G. Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vele, Dennis v. Wright, Randall et al
as 3:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dennis Neil Vele
Defendant:
Randall Wright, Randall Geise, Stephen P. Burroughs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Ferencz v. Larry Medlock, et al
as 14-3504
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHANNON FERENCZ, Administratrix of the ESTATE OF CADE STEVENS, and SHANNON FERENEZ, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY J. MEDLOCK, WARDEN OF THE FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON, in both his Official and Individual Capacities, BRIAN MILLER, DEPUTY WARDEN OF THE FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON, in both his official and Individual Capacities, PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY O'NEIL and BARRY SIMON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
