Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Charles Humphries, Jr. v. Jimmy Ashe
as 14-7387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD HUMPHRIES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JIMMY ASHE, Jackson County, NC Sheriff, C. B. HOOPER, Jackson County Sheriff's Department Deputy & Supervisor of Work Crew, MATT HELTON, Jackson County Sheriff's Department Lieutenant and others
Maurice Olivier v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-15467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE P. OLIVIER, AKA Maurice Pierre Olivier
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, R. WHITE, C. B. TUCKER and others
Johnson v. Heath
as 5:2014ct03058
Plaintiff:
KC Lee Johnson
Defendant:
C. B. Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv02087
Defendant:
R. Aranas, C. B., Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
George Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayramoglu v. Cate et al
as 4:2013cv01094
Plaintiff:
Fikri Bayramoglu
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Ben Curry, C C Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. State of California
as 2:2013cv00300
Petitioner:
C. B. Hickman, Sr
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medina v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Magadaleno Medina
Defendant:
C. B. Epps, E. L. Sparkman, R. King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Olivier v. Cate et al
as 4:2012cv04558
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Olivier
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, R. White, C. B. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGS v. GRIFFIS
as 4:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L SPRINGS
Defendant:
GRIFFIS, DAVID CARTRETT, HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. Matthews et al
as 3:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Nixon
Defendant:
William Matthews, S. Laurent, C. B. Bowlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
