Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Phelps et al v. Bedford et al
as 3:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps and Jamal Lee Bell
Defendant:
Officer Bedford, Sgt. or Officer Chism, L.T. Wendroff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Moya v. Chism et al
as 1:2021cv01624
Plaintiff:
Rene Anthony Moya
Defendant:
B. Chism, M. Putnam, M. VanNess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Morris Lee Love v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2021cv01380
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Love and Morris Lee Love, Jr.
Defendant:
P. Shaffer, Van-Ness and B. Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Putman et al
as 4:2021cv00840
Plaintiff:
Larry David Johnson
Defendant:
John Putman, Kerry Chism and Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Love v. Hanford Kings County Jail, et al.
as 1:2021cv01419
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Love and Morris Lee Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Hanford Kings County Jail, Van-Ness, Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harper v. Robinson, et al.
as 1:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Seth Harper
Defendant:
David Robinson, David Putnam, Crystal Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bottorff v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones, Wellpath LLC and Victor Sean Bottorff
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Dominicis et al
as 3:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones and Wellpath LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
