Cases 21 - 30 of 145
Gutierrez v. Williamson County District Courts et al
as 3:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney #1-6, Judge #1, Appellate Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. BB&T BANK et al
as 2:2020cv04530
Defendant:
BB&T BANK, BRANCH BANKING & TRUST, MAGISTRATE JUDGE NICHOLAS ENGLESSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diawara v. Castel et al
as 1:2020cv03673
Defendant:
Adam Sloan Hobson, Mollie Bracewell, Tom Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Alpha Diawara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor v. Ferraro et al
as 0:2019cv61693
Defendant:
C. Trant, Apex Court Reporter, Dorothy Ferraro and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Commissioner C. Overstreet et al
as 4:2019cv02455
Respondent:
Commissioner C. Overstreet, Court Reporters and Warden Incumbent
Petitioner:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Strojek v. Clerk of Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit , et al
as 8:2019cv01107
Plaintiff:
Matthew Strojek
Defendant:
Court Reporter of the Sixth Judicial Circuit and Clerk of Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SPEARMAN v. WILLIAMS
as 3:2019cv00043
Defendant:
COURT REPORTER SUSAN WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
RANDAL SPEARMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Nebraska Court of Appeals et al
as 4:2019cv03026
Defendant:
Samuel Santacroce, Nebraska Court of Appeals, Public Defender and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. GOSS et al
as 1:2018cv00143
Defendant:
CLERK EVONNE MULL, ATTORNEY CHARLES ARNOLD, JR, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER CARR and others
Plaintiff:
TOREY FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
