Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Clinton Cox v. Steve Kallis
as 17-3498
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLINTON D. COX
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE KALLIS, Warden
Marlon Blacher v. John Villamarin, et al
as 17-56031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON BLACHER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN VILLAMARIN, Correctional Peace Officer, in public and private capacity and D. COX, Lieutenant, Correctional Peace Officer, in public and private capacity
Cox v. Watson
as 1:2017cv01243
Petitioner:
Clinton D Cox
Respondent:
Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cox v. Wilson
as 2:2016cv00073
Petitioner:
Clinton D. Cox
Respondent:
David R. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas Stewart v. Ferris Police Department, et al
as 16-11064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
FERRIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, 2 Unknown Ferris Police Officers, ELLIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, 2 Unknown Ellis County Sheriff's Deputies, JUDGE BOB CARROLL, 40th District Court, Ellis County and others
Cox v. Foster et al
as 3:2016cv03152
Plaintiff:
Ollie D Cox
Defendant:
Craig Foster, Hauter, Vazzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Ferris Police Dept et al
as 3:2016cv00846
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stewart
Defendant:
Ferris Police Dept, Ellis County Sheriff's Department, Bob Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John W. Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2016cv00138
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Brown v. Cox et al.
as 2:2015cv02518
Plaintiff:
Jacky J. Brown
Defendant:
D. Cox, L. Davis, K. Martines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Jordan et al.
as 2:2015cv02474
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Hall
Defendant:
G. Jordan, B. Nicole, Jian Ma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
