Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Vymislicky v. CMC Medical Staff et al
as 9:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
Corey Jay Vymislicky
Defendant:
CMC Medical Staff, Broome County Correctional Facility, Ronald Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vymislicky v. CMC Medical Staff et al
as 1:2017cv00946
Plaintiff:
Corey Jay Vymislicky
Defendant:
CMC Medical Staff, Broome County Correctional Facility, Ronald Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neely v. Garza et al
as 1:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
Tarrie Neely
Defendant:
Garza, Habiak, Desai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMILLAN v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2014cv03270
Plaintiff:
NADRELL MCMILLAN
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, BINA K. DESAI, FALQUAI PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbie Collins v. Anthony Padula
as 14-6533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBBIE COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
HERMAN FINKLEY, ANTHONY PADULA, Warden, MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden and others
ABDUL-AZIZ et al v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
SHAROB ABDUL-AZIZ, WILLIAM MCCRAY, IBN PASHA and others
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO, ANDREW P. SIDAMON-ERISTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. McCall et al
as 6:2013cv00694
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Defendant:
Warden McCall, Assoc Warden Nolan, Assoc Warden Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Collins v. Padula et al
as 2:2012cv03112
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Defendant:
Anthony Padula, Michael McCall, Keith McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jasubhai Desai v. Raymond Booker
as 12-2050
Petitioner - Appellee:
JASUBHAI K. DESAI
Respondent - Appellant:
RAYMOND BOOKER, Warden
GIBSON v. SHOPRITE et al
as 1:2012cv04077
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ANTHONY GIBSON, JR.
Defendant:
SHOPRITE, MICHAEL KENNEDY, MARC HUBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
